# Correlation attacks on Bisq transactions?

**URL:** <https://bisq.community/t/correlation-attacks-on-bisq-transactions/6325>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [October 3, 2018, 6:20pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/correlation-attacks-on-bisq-transactions/6325 "2018-10-03T18:20:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Homard](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/homard/32/6_22734026db12803ebb3e059622ac3534.png) [@Homard](https://bisq.community/u/Homard)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2018, 6:39pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/correlation-attacks-on-bisq-transactions/6325/2 "2018-10-03T18:39:29Z")

</div>

Hi, there is an interesting discussion about privacy here:

> [@Privacy concern](https://bisq.community/t/privacy-concern/5055/6):
>
> One possible mitigation for users would be to use multiple bank accounts and/or transactions. bisq could potentially let the buyer break up their side of the payment into chunks and have different codes for each chunk so that no one code adds up to the exact fiat amount of the deal. I also like the round fiat amount idea, which is similar to one part of how Phore facilitates anonymous transactions. I would suggest a different mechanism for it though–let a seller make an offer for a variable/% b…

with some good tips to help with your privacy.  
Basically, swim in the center of the statistics.

---

_[View the full topic](https://bisq.community/t/correlation-attacks-on-bisq-transactions/6325)._
