# Help with upgrade please

**URL:** <https://bisq.community/t/help-with-upgrade-please/12751>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [February 26, 2025, 7:35pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/help-with-upgrade-please/12751 "2025-02-26T19:35:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nwododger](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/nwododger/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@nwododger](https://bisq.community/u/nwododger)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2025, 7:35pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/help-with-upgrade-please/12751/1 "2025-02-26T19:35:39Z")

</div>

Hi and downloaded the installer and verify signature when I recently launched Bisq. It syas I have to upgrade to version 1.19.19. I followed the steps in the wiki on verifying signature but get errors below. any suggestions please.

todd@Live5D:~/Downloads$ gpg --digest -algo SHA256 --verify 4A133008.asc  
gpg: Note: ‘–verify’ is not considered an option  
gpg: selected digest algorithm is invalid  
todd@Live5D:~/Downloads$ gpg --digest -algo SHA256 --verify E222AA02.asc  
gpg: Note: ‘–verify’ is not considered an option  
gpg: selected digest algorithm is invalid

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MnM](https://bisq.community/user_avatar/bisq.community/mnm/32/257_2.png) [@MnM](https://bisq.community/u/MnM)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2025, 7:34am UTC](https://bisq.community/t/help-with-upgrade-please/12751/2 "2025-02-27T07:34:56Z")

</div>

What I do is having .deb and .deb.asc file in the same directory (Downloads), so` cd Downloads` and `gpg --verify Bisqfile.deb.asc`

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nwododger](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/nwododger/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@nwododger](https://bisq.community/u/nwododger)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2025, 2:09pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/help-with-upgrade-please/12751/3 "2025-02-27T14:09:23Z")

</div>

thankyou. i receive this:

todd@Live5D:~/Downloads$ gpg --verify Bisq-64bit-1.9.19.deb.asc  
gpg: assuming signed data in ‘Bisq-64bit-1.9.19.deb’  
gpg: Signature made Mon 03 Feb 2025 05:07:47 PM CST  
gpg: using RSA key B493319106CC3D1F252E19CBF806F422E222AA02  
gpg: Good signature from “Alejandro García [alejandro.garcia@disroot.org](mailto:alejandro.garcia@disroot.org)” [expired]  
gpg: Note: This key has expired!  
Primary key fingerprint: B493 3191 06CC 3D1F 252E 19CB F806 F422 E222 AA02

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MnM](https://bisq.community/user_avatar/bisq.community/mnm/32/257_2.png) [@MnM](https://bisq.community/u/MnM)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2025, 8:22am UTC](https://bisq.community/t/help-with-upgrade-please/12751/4 "2025-02-28T08:22:22Z")

</div>

That’s enough, it means that it has been signed by this key, but it has not a good web of trust (it has not been signed by keys you trust, which is normal for occasional gpg users).