# Question about a couple of claims about Bisq

**URL:** <https://bisq.community/t/question-about-a-couple-of-claims-about-bisq/12023>\
**Category:** Support\
**Created:** [June 4, 2024, 1:54pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/question-about-a-couple-of-claims-about-bisq/12023 "2024-06-04T13:54:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SomeBisqUser](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/somebisquser/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@SomeBisqUser](https://bisq.community/u/SomeBisqUser)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2024, 1:54pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/question-about-a-couple-of-claims-about-bisq/12023/1 "2024-06-04T13:54:21Z")

</div>

> [Bisq] was developed by Bitcoin devs and originally planned to be a part of the official Bitcoin source code.

Source: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1d785xr/comment/l70b4ig/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1d785xr/comment/l70b4ig/)

Is this accurate? I never knew that the developers (supposedly) were also Bitcoin developers, or that it was actually going to be part of the Bitcoin (Core?) source code. This is the first I hear of this, which is why I’m asking.

It would’ve been pretty messy and controversial if it _were_ part of the source code! Still, maybe it would’ve been a good thing after all, if done in the right way, in terms of adoption of both.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![suddenwhipvapor](https://bisq.community/user_avatar/bisq.community/suddenwhipvapor/32/3291_2.png) [@suddenwhipvapor](https://bisq.community/u/suddenwhipvapor)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2024, 4:49pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/question-about-a-couple-of-claims-about-bisq/12023/2 "2024-06-05T16:49:21Z")

</div>

that’s one thing we have in common then, this is the first time hearing that story for me as well 🙂