# RBF is really needed **URL:** \ **Category:** Development\ **Created:** [April 14, 2021, 8:43am UTC](https://bisq.community/t/rbf-is-really-needed/10657 "2021-04-14T08:43:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Errelont](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/errelont/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@Errelont](https://bisq.community/u/Errelont)\ **Post date:** [April 14, 2021, 8:43am UTC](https://bisq.community/t/rbf-is-really-needed/10657/1 "2021-04-14T08:43:12Z")
I have a stuck transaction since yesterday, the issue is I accepted the buy offer that had a normal fee for the network at that time, before the next few blocks where found, the network started getting congested, the result ? now the fee is not even close to been adequate and without RBF I cant repost with higher fees… Any plans on supporting it in the future ? ---
**Author:** ![MnM](https://bisq.community/user_avatar/bisq.community/mnm/32/257_2.png) [@MnM](https://bisq.community/u/MnM)\ **Post date:** [April 14, 2021, 10:49am UTC](https://bisq.community/t/rbf-is-really-needed/10657/2 "2021-04-14T10:49:41Z")
Technically is not possible or very difficult to implement for trading, so it’s not on the horizon. ---
**Author:** ![Errelont](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/errelont/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@Errelont](https://bisq.community/u/Errelont)\ **Post date:** [April 14, 2021, 11:08am UTC](https://bisq.community/t/rbf-is-really-needed/10657/3 "2021-04-14T11:08:47Z")
If there was a mechanism for both parties to split the costs, wouldnt that work? Cause I assume that would be the issue, who pays for it. ---
**Author:** ![MnM](https://bisq.community/user_avatar/bisq.community/mnm/32/257_2.png) [@MnM](https://bisq.community/u/MnM)\ **Post date:** [April 14, 2021, 11:15am UTC](https://bisq.community/t/rbf-is-really-needed/10657/4 "2021-04-14T11:15:06Z")
It’s a technical reason. Taker already assumes most of the trading costs, so I guess it should be the taker who pays, but only if taker wanted.