# Study On Rejected Refactorings

**URL:** <https://bisq.community/t/study-on-rejected-refactorings/9731>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [August 13, 2020, 11:45am UTC](https://bisq.community/t/study-on-rejected-refactorings/9731 "2020-08-13T11:45:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rejectedRefactorings](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/rejectedrefactorings/32/6_22734026db12803ebb3e059622ac3534.png) [@rejectedRefactorings](https://bisq.community/u/rejectedRefactorings)\
**Post date:** [August 13, 2020, 11:45am UTC](https://bisq.community/t/study-on-rejected-refactorings/9731/1 "2020-08-13T11:45:05Z")

</div>

Dear contributors,

As part of a research team from Università della Svizzera italiana (Switzerland) and University of Sannio (Italy), we have analyzed refactoring pull requests in bisq-network/bisq repository and are looking for developers for a short 5-10 min survey ([https://usi.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV\_cO6Ayah0D6q4eSF](https://usi.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cO6Ayah0D6q4eSF)). Would you please spare your time by answering some questions about refactoring-related contributions? We would greatly appreciate your input — it would help us understand how developers can improve the quality of refactoring contributions, and benefit the development process. The responses will be anonymized and handled confidentially! Thank you a lot!

If you consider this message to be spam, I’m very sorry! There will be no follow-up to bug you.