# Western union/moneygram as payment option

**URL:** <https://bisq.community/t/western-union-moneygram-as-payment-option/1068>\
**Category:** Payment methods\
**Created:** [December 28, 2016, 11:13pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/western-union-moneygram-as-payment-option/1068 "2016-12-28T23:13:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![s1lverbox](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/s1lverbox/32/6_22734026db12803ebb3e059622ac3534.png) [@s1lverbox](https://bisq.community/u/s1lverbox)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2016, 11:13pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/western-union-moneygram-as-payment-option/1068/1 "2016-12-28T23:13:26Z")

</div>

Hey all.

Was wonder if we can have western union and moneygram cash in store option. chargeback almost impossible and receipt as proof easily to obtain.

Thanks in advance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marc](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/marc/32/6_22734026db12803ebb3e059622ac3534.png) [@marc](https://bisq.community/u/marc)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2016, 12:45pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/western-union-moneygram-as-payment-option/1068/2 "2016-12-29T12:45:10Z")

</div>

As these work like cash deposit, I think WU and MG could be added in a similar way. We didn’t really consider them due to very high fees. What makes you think people would use it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![s1lverbox](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/s1lverbox/32/6_22734026db12803ebb3e059622ac3534.png) [@s1lverbox](https://bisq.community/u/s1lverbox)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2016, 11:27pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/western-union-moneygram-as-payment-option/1068/3 "2016-12-29T23:27:44Z")

</div>

Thanks for prompt answer. Fees are not important. WU / MG is global so therefore anyone can buy from me bitcoins using this method.  
If buyer is happy to pay premium why not? if we limit ourselves to only bank transfers/deposits that will be pointless.

If cash in store is used, chargeback is 0% possible. So i would vote for this to be added.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marc](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/marc/32/6_22734026db12803ebb3e059622ac3534.png) [@marc](https://bisq.community/u/marc)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2016, 11:46pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/western-union-moneygram-as-payment-option/1068/4 "2016-12-29T23:46:20Z")

</div>

I see. You seem to have some experience with WU/MG. It would be great if you could help me figure this out.

What is the mandatory information (text fields) to send and receive money via WU and MG?

A buyer needs to be able to prove he sent the fiat money. Would it be possible in both cases to tear a paper receipt into 4 pieces and take a picture of it?

I did a short google search and instantly found a WU fake receipt generator. I gues that would be a problem.

What do you think?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![s1lverbox](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/s1lverbox/32/6_22734026db12803ebb3e059622ac3534.png) [@s1lverbox](https://bisq.community/u/s1lverbox)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2016, 12:03am UTC](https://bisq.community/t/western-union-moneygram-as-payment-option/1068/5 "2016-12-30T00:03:02Z")

</div>

With WU:

For seller :

[1.Name](http://1.Name)  
2. surname  
3. country  
4. currency (sometimes country can pay in 2/3 different ones within same country)

For buyer seller providing:

1.MTCN  
[2.Name](http://2.Name)  
3.Surname  
4.country  
5. amount in chosen currency.

Proof for sender: photo of paper receipt with custom note or even ID  
For receiver: Again photo of receipt with all details visible.  
Also: WU allows to check online if transfer is ready to be picked up/ waiting/ or picked up by receiver. So not that easy to scam.

For moneygram same rule apply:

Both buyer/seller must provide name surname , country, and currency.  
On both ends ID is needed so not that easy to scam neither. Paper receipts and online check possible.

Hope that helps. I was doing a lot WU on localbitcoins and never been scammed even once. Fingers crossed of course.

To be honest i think even simple feedback system would help a lot in both cases. as of now without ranking or feedback system in place there is huge chance someone might scam.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marc](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/marc/32/6_22734026db12803ebb3e059622ac3534.png) [@marc](https://bisq.community/u/marc)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2016, 1:21pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/western-union-moneygram-as-payment-option/1068/6 "2016-12-30T13:21:28Z")

</div>

Wow, thanks a ton.

Looking good.

I’ll do some more research and will talk to Manfred about adding. Might even be in the next release.

Thanks again!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![diegotco](https://bisq.community/user_avatar/bisq.community/diegotco/32/1106_2.png) [@diegotco](https://bisq.community/u/diegotco)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2017, 3:34pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/western-union-moneygram-as-payment-option/1068/7 "2017-10-13T15:34:46Z")

</div>

Well, we still waitign for WU on Bisq. I live in Ecuador and here WU is very common.

Please add WU and MG. Thank you
