# Whitepaper looks amateurish and poorly written

**URL:** <https://bisq.community/t/whitepaper-looks-amateurish-and-poorly-written/477>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [August 15, 2016, 4:41pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/whitepaper-looks-amateurish-and-poorly-written/477 "2016-08-15T16:41:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ycepgoav](https://bisq.community/letter_avatar/ycepgoav/32/6_22734026db12803ebb3e059622ac3534.png) [@ycepgoav](https://bisq.community/u/ycepgoav)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2016, 4:41pm UTC](https://bisq.community/t/whitepaper-looks-amateurish-and-poorly-written/477/1 "2016-08-15T16:41:40Z")

</div>

It gives me the impression that it was written by a 14 year old kid, honestly. Definitely not giving much confidence in bitsquare. The formatting is not readable, there are no technical details it almost looks like a user’s guide, there are no references etc. Please fix this, you can refer to bitcoin whitepaper for improving it, although that’s not the best whitepaper out there it’s a start.