Agreed on all points, but I want to clarify the one above as follows:
the seller has no right to not accept the payment from the buyer, unless the buyer has violated Bisq’s trading protocol.
That is, if a buyer follows the rules and makes no mistakes, their seller has no right to refuse their payment.
If, on the other hand, a buyer makes a mistake or otherwise violates the rules of Bisq’s trading protocol, such as by using an incorrect name, sending the wrong payment amount, sending the payment from the wrong bank, sending the payment in the wrong currency, sending the payment after the trading window has closed, and so on, then the seller does have the right to refuse payment.
The clarification above reflects the way I have actually handled dozens of cases. Furthermore, it cleanly addresses the case at hand: per the language above, @avocado had no right not to accept the buyer’s payment, for the buyer had made no mistake. In no way and at no time is it acceptable for a seller to refuse a buyer’s payment solely on the basis that is in his interest to refuse it. Permitting this sort of behavior would obviously be unfair to buyers and would surely destroy Bisq’s reputation over time.
@ManfredKarrer, @keo, do you agree?