Update 4 about Bisq Exploit response

This is intended as my last reply on this matter, and I’d like the flare-up to stop altogether.

Henrik has been a key Bisq contributor since late 2022, and Bisq wouldn’t even be here without his contributions, as can be verified on public GitHub pages.

User “purplemonstera”, who created his account right before publishing his post, stated that “hardheadarea” was suspended for asking questions. Public posts show this is false, as the suspension was due to repeated combative behavior toward staff and ignoring their guidance.

He also stated that Alejandro did not receive or sign the binaries, ignoring Henrik’s reply above his own, sharing a link to all binaries except the aarch64 build that Alejandro had also signed. If he doesn’t trust the aarch64 binaries, he can use the amd64 ones under Rosetta, as he must have been doing until 1.9.22.

Alejandro’s signature of Henrik’s key should be published soon.

With regards to the binaries signed by Alejandro, those can be downloaded from the GitHub release page for version 1.10.