saying, the field for reason of payment in bank transfers should be empty in future. Is there a any date this will be applied? I wonder If two peers have version v1.5.5 and v1.5.4 but do trade what will happen. Or one would be missing the tradeid from payments?
In my opinion, there is PRO:
increased privacy.
less oblivious you trade on bisq for bank account statement.
Contra:
could open some type of scam,
where you as seller have less way to verify the payment come from trade partners own bank accountâŚ
By quick search couldnât find more information regarding this. So if you have please link to.
I see the Subject does not match the tradeID. the reason of payment is just called empty?
Bisqâs latest official directions dictated that nothing more should be written in the payment description. I did not understand: so the payment has not arrived?
Yes, I read the changes too. I just thought, it applies to bank wire transfer payments only. Iâm not sure if âblank payment reasonâ rule now includes moneybeam and/or revolut payments?
I donât think for MoneyBeam / Revolut it is any different⌠I think leaving the field blank causes even less suspicion for the bank, but I donât know.
Not clear for everyone now what all applies the rule changes to?
Rule changes apply to everything currently. See end of github #2869 above regarding âI think leaving the field blank causes even less suspicion for the bank, but I donât know.â = most likely yes.
There was point of contention/issue raised by a seller of SEPA. I said to make a github request etc. if that was the case etc. donât think one has.
