I’m running Fedora 32 and I’ve downloaded the Bisq-64bit-1.3.5.rpm but doing an rpm -ivh wasn’t enough, it died with a lot of dependency errors:
rpm -ivh Bisq*.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
ld-linux.so.2 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libX11.so.6 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libXext.so.6 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libXi.so.6 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libXrender.so.1 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libXtst.so.6 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libasound.so.2 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libc.so.6 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libdl.so.2 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libm.so.6 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libpthread.so.0 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
libthread_db.so.1 is needed by bisq-1.3.5-1.x86_64
However, when I tried doing a dnf whatprovides on them, they’re shown as i686 libs rather than x86_64 libs, for example:
dnf whatprovides ld-linux.so.2
glibc-2.31-2.fc32.i686 : The GNU libc libraries
Repo : fedora
Matched from:
Provide : ld-linux.so.2
That doesn’t seem right, since the Bisq RPM claims to be an x86_64 package. Also I see several X11 libs in the list which could also be problematic since Fedora is a Wayland-based distro. Before I install a lot of weird RPMs and trash my system, I thought I’d check here and see if anyone had successfully installed and run Bisq on Fedora 32 and if maybe there were some more detailed instructions for the process somewhere.